Ceci n'est pas un jardin, suivi de Pour les désespéré seulement : une résistance végétale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis explores how plant life allows for poetic discourse. First, the creative piece is a story presented in fragments where plant life participates in a diversion of speech. By using representations of invasive plants, the narrator reports her depressive and anxious symptoms without having to name them. This creates an intimate voice, which resists the harsh categorization of diagnoses she cannot share or accept – trying to express the inexpressible. Subsequently, the critical section plays out by resisting on a collective level. The research component focuses on René Lapierre’s collection of poems Pour les désespérés seulement. The author takes several excerpts from the Flore-manuel de la province de Québec, versifies and italicizes them in his poems. I indicate in my analysis that this intertextuality allows for poetic voice to establish a form of resistance in a society dismissed as no longer viable because of its rigid and profit-oriented character. Finally, I identify how the intertextual mentions of plant life, both in my fragments and in Lapierre’s poetry, allows us to reflect on rupture, polyphony and resistance in the face of constraining speech
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".