MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7162010053 · doi:10.82308/9474

Rapid identification and classification of «Escherichia coli» and «Shigella» by attenuated total reflectance - Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

2017· dissertation· en· W7162010053 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tien My Lisa Lam

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAttenuated total reflectionEscherichia coliMicroorganismShigellaFourier transform infrared spectroscopyGel electrophoresisPolymerase chain reactionSample preparationAnalytical Chemistry (journal)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rapid identification of microorganisms is a trending topic in research today. By comparison with other methods of microorganism identification like polymerase chain reaction (PCR), pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy is much quicker in terms of time of analysis. In addition, ATR-FTIR spectroscopy requires no reagents, is cost effective and has potential to identify microorganisms down to the pathotype level. Most foodborne illnesses are due to improper food handling which can lead to the contamination of food products with pathogenic bacteria such as some strains of Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Shigella species. Differentiating between E. coli and Shigella spp. is challenging because they are genetically similar and was investigated in this thesis by using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. Various strains of Escherichia (n=190) and Shigella (n=145) of fecal and blood origin were obtained from the McGill University Health Center (MUHC), Laboratoire de Santé Publique du Québec (LSPQ) and Health Canada (HC). For preparation of the samples for analysis, the samples were taken from frozen cultures, plated onto culture media, and incubated at 37C for 18-24 h. After incubation, the sample was sub-cultured and incubated using the same parameters as in the first culture. After sub-culturing, a single isolated colony was taken and smeared onto the ATR crystal of the ATR-FTIR instrument to acquire a spectrum. By using principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) of the ATR-FTIR spectral data, E. coli was successfully discriminated from Shigella species based on their spectral differences at the regions of 1478-1411 and 1070-1040 cm-1. Moreover, successful discrimination between Shigella sonnei and Shigella flexneri was achieved by using the spectral regions of 1136-1113 and 1218-1207 cm-1. For E. coli O157:H7 and non-O157:H7 Shiga-toxin-producing E. coli (STEC), the separation between the two groups was successful using the regions of 1248-1212 and 1356-1344 cm-1. In conclusion, ATR-FTIR spectroscopy has potential for identifying E. coli and Shigella at the genus, species, pathotype and serotype levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingFrench-language works237,207