MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7162021214 · doi:10.82308/23693

Deeming a predatory spouse unworthy to inherit under Canadian Common Law

2012· dissertation· en· W7162021214 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dorota Bogajewska

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFamily and Matrimonial Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPropositionSpouseDoctrineCommon lawCommon senseClass (philosophy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette thèse expose l'injustice et les conséquences potentielles dans la common law canadienne des «mariages prédateurs» impliquant des personnes âgées. Dans les cas où un conjoint vulnérable, victime de manipulation dans le mariage, est indument influencé dans l'exécution d'un nouveau testament en faveur de son conjoint prédateur, cette thèse propose un recours en empêchant le conjoint prédateur d'hériter après la mort du conjoint victime. Cette proposition est développée à travers une étude comparative de la doctrine de l'influence indue du droit canadien et de ses équivalents du droit allemand. La «slayer rule» de la common law et la législation sur l'abus des personnes âgées contribuent à justifier la solution proposée.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFamily and Matrimonial LawFrench-language works237,207