MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7162025047 · doi:10.82308/30436

Determinants of analgesic responses following medical cannabis initiation among patients with chronic pain

2021· dissertation· en· W7162025047 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Romina Sotoodeh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnalgesicChronic painCannabisAffect (linguistics)Depression (economics)AnxietyMedical cannabisPain catastrophizing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Pain is one of the most common reasons for which patients visit healthcare providers. In Canada, chronic pain is a major health problem that affects about 20% of adults. Over the past two decades, there has been a rise in the use of cannabis for therapeutic purposes, and there is a growing body of research supporting the analgesic benefits of medical cannabis for patients with chronic pain. To date, however, little is known on the factors that contribute to the analgesic benefits of cannabis in these patients. Given that symptoms of anxiety and depression (i.e., negative affect) and sleep problems are linked to heightened clinical pain intensity, there is reason to believe that reductions in patients' negative affect and sleep problems resulting from cannabis use might indirectly contribute to reductions in pain intensity. It is possible that other patient-specific factors might also contribute to the analgesic benefits of medical cannabis, but these factors have remained largely unexplored. Objectives: The first objective of the present thesis was to examine if medical cannabis use was associated with reductions in “average” pain as well as with clinically significant (i.e., ≥ 30%) reductions in clinical pain intensity among patients with chronic noncancer pain. The second objective of the present thesis was to examine whether the association between medical cannabis use and reductions in clinical pain intensity was attributable to concurrent changes in negative affect and pain-related sleep interference. The third objective was to examine whether patient-specific characteristics were associated with reductions in clinical pain intensity following initiation of medical cannabis.Methods: In this longitudinal study, chronic noncancer pain patients (n = 2068) completed self-report measures assessing a host of sociodemographic, lifestyle, medical, and psychological variables. Measures assessing clinical pain intensity, negative affect, and pain-related sleep interference were completed at baseline and every three months, for a duration of one year, following initiation of medical cannabis. Results: Analyses first indicated that initiation of medical cannabis was associated with reductions in “average” pain intensity (p < .05). However, medical cannabis use was not significantly associated with clinically significant (i.e., ≥ 30%) reductions in pain intensity. Further analyses indicated that initiation of medical cannabis was associated with reductions in negative affect and pain-related sleep interference (both p's < .05). Interestingly, reductions in pain intensity following the initiation of medical cannabis remained significant even after controlling for concurrent reductions in negative affect and pain-related sleep interference (p < .05). Analyses subsequently showed that patient characteristics such as age and sex were significant predictors of reductions in average pain intensity following initiation of medical cannabis (both p's < .05). Conclusion: Findings from this thesis provide valuable new insights into our understanding of factors that may contribute to reductions in pain among patients with chronic pain who are using medical cannabis. Our results suggest that reductions in pain intensity following medical cannabis initiation are likely to be explained, in part, by concurrent reductions in negative affect and pain-related sleep interference. However, our findings indicated that reductions in pain following cannabis use cannot be entirely attributable to concurrent changes (i.e., reductions) in these variables. Finally, our findings indicated that the association between medical cannabis use and reductions in pain intensity was more pronounced among certain subgroups of patients, such as women and older patients. From a clinical point of view, our results could have implications for clinicians involved in the management of patients who might be considering medical cannabis as a therapeutic avenue

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCannabis and Cannabinoid Research→French-language works237,207→