MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7162025413 · doi:10.59236/emro.v26i10a8341

We Iranian Women

2024· article· W7162025413 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rachael Dreyer

Bibliographic record

VenueEducational Media Reviews Online · 2024
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Studies and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoralityMiddle EastCriticismHuman rights

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distributed by epf media, 324 S. Beverly Drive, PMB 437, Beverly Hills, CA 90212; 310-839-1500Produced by Didi Gnocchi and Gloria BogiDirected by Sabina Fedeli and Anna Migotto2023, Streaming, 57 mins Directors Sabina Fedeli and Anna Migotto have crafted a powerful film with We Iranian Women. At just under an hour of running time, each minute is deeply impactful. Armed and violent conflict has consumed much of the Middle East over the past several years and we may fail to comprehend the scale of the destruction of human life. However, this film presents an intimate and personal picture of the tragic histories of Iranian women who rebel against the repressive society in which they live. The protests at the center of this documentary were a reaction to the death of 22-year-old Mahsa Amini on September 16, 2022. Her scarf had slipped loose, and she was arrested by the morality police; she died while in custody. Her death set off a wave of protest and retaliation by the Ayatollah’s regime. The first protesters were killed in December of 2022, and set off a further cycle of aggressive protests and retaliatory arrests and killings. As the filmmakers illustrate, the coercive nature of the retaliation extends beyond the women involved in the protests themselves: women are killed in prisons, as well as by suicide, in part because the regime threatens the families of the protesters so that they accept the government’s version of events. The film demonstrates how the morality police overstep their purview to the extent that wide swaths of Iranian society have revolted against their harsh enforcement methods, going on strike to oppose the regime. As one woman says in the film, “be afraid of our anger.” There is a point of desperation that Iranian society has clearly reached, where protesters feel as though there is nothing left to lose in resisting the repressive rule of the regime. As the documentary illustrates, Iranians carve out private freedoms amid public repression; the protests only serve to heighten the cracks in the regime’s system of enforcement and oppression. The directors provide helpful context for viewers with a brief overview of contemporary Iranian history. They highlight the ideological shifts in Iranian government and society, from the shah’s rule to the 1978 uprising, to the return of the Ayatollah in 1979. This context is vital to understand the different generational experiences of the Iranian people. The historical background illustrates how the Ayatollah’s regime has a history of systematically suppressing young people’s protest through violence, coercion, and executions; one horrific example included were the mass executions of thousands of people at prisons all over the country 1988. The Human Rights Watch has monitored these killings, and more information can be found at Human Rights Watch. At its heart, the Iranian protests are not so different from protests we’ve seen in recent years in the United States; both center on the basic human right of control over one’s body. Whether the choice is whether to wear the veil or reproductive freedom, it is the right to make a choice rather than be compelled. Speaking about the issues of bodily autonomy in this country, Planned Parenthood President Alexis McGill Johnson stated at the 2024 Democratic National Convention, “We cannot call ourselves a free nation when women are not free.” This puts the U.S. in bleak parallel with the religious, totalitarian Iranian regime. With these similarities in mind, the women interviewed for the documentary urge the international community to take substantive action: impose additional sanctions and obstruct the nuclear deal until protections and freedoms for women are guaranteed and enshrined in law, for example. And indeed, several of the women interviewed - members of the Iranian diaspora - are highly accomplished experts in their fields: literature, film and theater, politics, academia. They serve as a testament to what women can do with freedom, self-determination, and opportunity. Fideli and Migotto have crafted a powerful argument in praise of the endurance and strength of womankind that is recommended viewing for upper secondary grades and above. Awards:Best Documentary, Cinema d'iDEA, Italy

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.589
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEducational Media Reviews OnlineSame topicIslamic Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207