Effects of Early Life exposure to the Organophosphate Flame Retardant, Triphenyl Phosphate on Stress and Stress Related Behaviour in Birds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our environment is contaminated by hundreds of thousands of chemicals. While regulations have been established to control production and release of some of these chemicals, thousands of new chemicals are introduced to the market on an annual basis. Traditional toxicity tests have focused on outcomes such as mortality, impaired growth and reproduction. However, recent studies have been promoting behaviour as a measure of exposure to contaminants, given that it is more sensitive than traditional toxicological endpoints, can encompass multiple levels of biological organization, and is directly related to an organism’s fitness. Among other effects, it alters behaviour in response to acute stressors, and helps regulate key life history decisions such as reproduction. Evidence in the literature has demonstrated that exposure to contaminants impacts the stress response and associated behaviours, however, these are few in number. Triphenyl phosphate (TPHP) is an organophosphate flame retardant that has been classified as a priority chemical under the Government of Canada’s Chemicals Management Plan. Preliminary studies have demonstrated that TPHP causes behavioural changes, physical deformities and changes to the gene expression of the stress axis (Hypothalamus-pituitary-interrenal (HPI) axis) in zebrafish (Danio rerio). However, little is known about this compound’s potentially toxic effects in other taxa. The objective of my thesis is to determine the effects of TPHP on stress and stress-related behaviour in Japanese Quail. Developing quail were exposed to TPHP in ovo and orally for the first week of life. Treatment groups consisted of safflower oil (control), predicted environmentally relevant levels of TPHP (5 ng/g) and higher levels of TPHP (50 ng/g and 100 ng/g). In addition to measures of mortality and deformities, individuals from all treatment groups were subjected to behavioural tests involving tonic immobility, contact with a novel object and exploration of a novel environment. Baseline and stress-induced corticosterone concentration were also measured. Chicks exposed to higher doses of TPHP (100 ng/g) administered significantly more pecks (18.0 ± 2.8) upon a novel object in comparison to the lower dose group (5 ng/g) and control (10.3 ± 0.9 and 9.5 ± 1.4 pecks respectively). As mentioned above, while baseline and corticosterone concentrations were measured, the results were difficult to interpret due to the assay being difficult to validate, and only 44% of the birds were successfully blood sampled past the 3 minute mark. Baseline values varied between 0.42 ± 0.1 and 2.9 ± 0.95 ug/mL, while stress values varied between 2.3 ± 0.61 and 11 ± 1.9 ug/mL. The change from baseline to stress samples varied between 2.0 ± 0.4 and 7.65 ± 1.4 ug/mL. The average pre-stress corticosterone was lower than the post-stress corticosterone, however there was a positive relationship seen between sampling time and post-stress corticosterone concentrations. Lastly, no relationship between TPHP and corticosterone was observed, which should be interpreted with caution given the issues with the assay. Overall, these data suggest that TPHP affects neophobic behaviour in Japanese Quail exposed to 100 ng/g of TPHP. This exceeds the 5 ng/g that was initially defined as an environmentally relevant dose when the study was designed. However, in light of recent evidence that TPHP is rapidly metabolized in birds, this implies our initial definition of environmental relevance may not be correct. Alterations to the stress response could prove to be extremely detrimental to any species, as it could lower the ability to cope with acute environmental changes, and evade predators. Increasing our understanding of behavioural effects of TPHP in birds will support risk assessment to effectively minimize any potential deleterious impacts on wildlife
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".