The role of coping and cultural identity in protecting First Nations youth against substance use
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude examine la relation entre les stratégies d'adaptation, l'identité culturelle et la consommation de drogues et d'alcool chez les jeunes des Premières Nations. Quatre-vingt sept étudiants provenant de deux écoles dans deux communautés distinctes des Premières Nations au Québec, Canada ont participé à cette étude. Les résultats démontrent que l'adoption de comportements ethniques, une composante de l'identité culturelle, peut protéger contre la consommation de drogues et d'alcool. D'autre part, les participants qui s' identifient à la culture blanche et qui utilisent le désengagement comportemental comme stratégie d'adaptation sont les plus susceptibles à consommer ces stupéfiants. Les résultats de cette étude soutiennent la notion que l'identité culturelle joue un rôle important dans la protection des jeunes des Premières Nations contre la consommation de drogues et d'alcool. Les interventions qui mettent en valeur les moyens de développer l'identité culturelle chez les jeunes des Premières Nations seront peut être plus efficaces à prévenir la consommation de drogues et d'alcool comparé à celles qui promeuvent la transmission de stratégies d'adaptation positives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".