MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7162030619 · doi:10.82308/38663

Microbial diversity and activity in permafrost and ground ice from the Canadian High Arctic

2007· dissertation· en· W7162030619 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Blaire. Steven

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPolar Research and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPermafrostFirmicutesMicrobial population biologyArchaeaCrenarchaeotaPhylumArcticActinobacteriaProteobacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have developed methods to obtain pristine permafrost/ground ice samples from the Canadian high Arctic and demonstrated that these methods are suitable for both culture-dependent and culture-independent microbiological analyses. In an initial study, the culturable microbial community in a 9 m deep permafrost sample was dominated by spore-forming genera of Bacteria from the phylum Firmicutes while the phyla Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria were also represented. Phenotypic characterization of the isolates indicated a predominantly psychrotolerant and halotolerant microbial community. A culture-independent survey of the microbial diversity in this sample revealed higher diversity, as Bacteria from 6 phyla (Actinobacteria, CFB, Firmicutes, Gemmatimonadetes, Planctomyces , and Proteobacteria) and both of the major Archaea phyla (Euryarchaeota and Crenarchaeota ) were identified. Differences in the abundance, diversity, and activity of the microbial communities in distinct horizons of a permafrost/ground ice core were investigated using a combination of culture-independent methods, aerobic plate counts and a novel method for detecting microbial activity at subzero temperatures, developed during this thesis. The active layer, permafrost table, and permafrost horizons showed similar microbial abundance and diversity. The microbial community in ground ice was less abundant and diverse. The culturable microbial community from the active layer was composed of Bacteria related to the Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, CFB, and Firmicutes while all of the isolates from the permafrost were related to spore-forming Firmicutes. No viable cells were recovered from the ground ice. Microbial activity was detected in all of the Eur3 horizons, including low levels of activity at near ambient subzero permafrost temperatures. Many of the isolates from the permafrost had low 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity to characterized species. A polyphasic characterization of one of these potentially unique isolates was undertaken to better define its taxonomy. The isolate (Eur1 9.5) was differentiated from related species based on its morphology, fatty acid profile and growth characteristics and represents the type species of a new genus, namely Tumebacillus permanentifrigoris . This work demonstrates that Canadian high Arctic permafrost is a unique environment that harbors a diverse microbial community with members capable of activity at near in situ temperatures. In comparison, ground ice is a relatively inhospitable environment and supports low microbial abundance, diversity and activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score0.276

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPolar Research and EcologyFrench-language works237,207