MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7162033877 · doi:10.82308/48345

Relationship of home environment to indicators of asthma in Montreal and Port Alberni school children

2000· dissertation· en· W7162033877 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Angeli. Mitra

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIndoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsthmaSpirometryPort (circuit theory)Passive smokingTest (biology)Indoor air quality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objectives of this thesis were: (i) assess the role of indoor air pollutants and allergens with respect to their individual contribution to EIB and reported asthma in elementary schoolchildren in Montreal and Port Alberni; and (ii) to determine how the effect of these indoor environmental pollutants and allergens are modified by host factors, such as gender. The hypothesis was that increased levels of indoor allergens and pollutants are associated with a higher prevalence of asthma and/or EIB; this association being modified by gender. Initially a cross-sectional study was carried out of 989 Montreal elementary schoolchildren, and 1,785 Port Alberni elementary schoolchildren. A questionnaire was completed by the parents and exercise test was carried out in which the children performed spirometry before and after a free running exercise test. For the purpose of this thesis a sub-sample of 332 children from Montreal and 305 children from Port Alberni were combined and a more detailed case-control study pertaining to home environment carried out. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.659
Threshold uncertainty score0.679

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndoor Air Quality and Microbial ExposureFrench-language works237,207