MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7162035011 · doi:10.82308/14329

Influential parameters of near-roadway ultrafine particles along open patio spaces

2016· dissertation· en· W7162035011 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alexander Lee

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)DowntownUltrafine particleSituatedHospitalityGeographic information systemData collectionLand use

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this thesis is to identify factors related to meteorology and the built environment and its influence on near-roadway concentrations of ultrafine particles (UFP) in the context of restaurants and bars located within public open air spaces. The question that must be posed is how are variations in weather, traffic, on-site building characteristics impacting levels of UFP concentration, which in turn may produce adverse health effects for restaurant patrons as well as individuals working within hospitality industries. To facilitate this study, a UFP monitoring campaign was organized and conducted during the months of May to July to measure at eight selected sites situated in Montreal, Canada. The eight study sites, chosen to reflect varying land use compositions and building characteristics, were each visited four times during lunch and dinner hours, where a site would be visited a total of two times (once per time period) during the weekday, and two times (once per time period) during the weekend. This campaign used meteorological information collected at the Montreal-Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport and at an automated weather station reporting from downtown Montreal. Traffic-related variables were derived from manual vehicle counts carried out at each study location, and the analysis of land use and other built characteristics relied on geographic information systems (GIS) data extracted from Transportation Research at McGill (TRAM), a transportation research group based at McGill University. The investigation following the conclusion of the data collection campaign began by developing linear mixed effect models centred on variables relating to meteorology, traffic, site characteristics, and temporal factors. This data enables the validation of trends already defined in previous academic literature as well as to identify key findings that are contrary to intuitive hypotheses in the context of this study. Of note, meteorological effects such as temperature, wind speed, and wind direction relative to the orientation of the street are proven to possess inverse relationships with UFP. Homogeneity of land use is also an influential parameter and of significance with respect to this study of mixed use microenvironments. Furthermore, traffic-based predictors, most notably that of total diesel vehicles, contributed marginally to their concentrations. The conclusions reached from this study, along with what is already known about ultrafine particles, allows for dialogue pertaining to optimizing the effectiveness of mixed use neighbourhoods from a health perspective in the context of open air patios. Provisional recommendations to improve the decision-making processes involved with planning and engineering such neighbourhoods are discussed and is critical for understanding the health and well-being of urban residents. Keywords: air pollution exposure, environmental monitoring, land use, public health, restaurant patios, ultrafine particles

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.098

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAir Quality and Health Impacts→French-language works237,207→