MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7162036011 · doi:10.82308/48140

Genetic investigation of vascular diseases in the French-Canadian population

2000· dissertation· en· W7162036011 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Caroline. Fournier

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenin-Angiotensin System Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMethylenetetrahydrofolate reductaseDiseaseApolipoprotein EPopulationIschemic strokeStroke (engine)Genetic variantsVascular diseaseGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ischemic stroke and ischemic heart disease (IHD) are complex disorders which are influenced by both environmental and genetic factors. To identify genetic risk factors to these disease, we conducted two association studies in a population where a significant founder effect has occurred: the French-Canadians. We studied 10 polymorphisms, in the following 9 genes, which have previously been implicated in the development of IHD and/or ischemic stroke: angiotensinogen (M235T), angiotensin-converting enzyme (287 by I/D), angiotensin II type I receptor (A1166C), coagulating factor V (Leiden mutation), platelet glycoprotein IIIa (PLA1/PLA2 alleles), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (4G/5G), apolipoprotein E (E2, E3, and E4 isoforms), methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (C677T), and stromelysin-1 (5A/6A). In the first study, we investigated the relationship between the gene variants listed above and 150 IHD patients and 113 controls, who matched on age, gender, and ethnic background. In the second study, we investigated the relationship between these same genetic variants and 97 French-Canadians with cerebrovascular disease (59 ischemic strokes, 38 TIAs) and 134 age and gender matched French-Canadian controls. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.156
Threshold uncertainty score0.769

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRenin-Angiotensin System StudiesFrench-language works237,207