MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7162039120 · doi:10.82308/33241

Cam-profile optimization by means of undercutting in cam-roller speed reducers

2003· dissertation· en· W7162039120 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Weimin Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMachinabilityCurvatureKinematicsFlexibility (engineering)Point (geometry)Focus (optics)Position (finance)Spline (mechanical)Robot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Speed-o-Cam, a family of speed-reduction mechanisms based on cams and pure-rolling contact, is currently under development at McGill University's Centre for Intelligent Machines. This family is intended to replace gears and harmonic drives in applications where backlash, friction, and flexibility cannot be tolerated. In this thesis, we focus on the internal and external planar Speed-o-Cam with both positive and negative actions. We introduce 2-4-6 and 2-4-6-8 polynomials to modify the cam profile around both the cusp and the blunt point of the profile to improve the cam dynamic and kinematic performance. In a third approach, we resort to a cubic spline to solve the same problem. We pay special attention to the curvature of the cam, especially in connection with its machinability. To this end, we resort to Fourier analysis and, thus, propose the concept of loss of geometric regularity, which measures curvature changes. Then, we propose one more concept, the effective machinability of a cam. Both machinability and effective machinability vary from 0% to 100%. We also study the pressure-angle distribution and derive the relationships between the pressure angle and the parameters of the cam. A method to decrease the pressure angle under negative action is introduced. Moreover, an application of Speed-o-Cam to the design of the driving units of wheeled mobile robots is reported in the thesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.625
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMechanical Engineering and Vibrations ResearchFrench-language works237,207