The ecology and evolution of antimicrobial resistance in asymptomatic Salmonella enterica /
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Infections caused by resistant pathogens fail to respond to treatment, resulting in increased costs due to prolonged illness and hospitalization. Determining the extent of resistance in animal populations is thus of great importance to public health. In this work, we first showed that asymptomatic populations of Salmonella in pigs present greater genotypic and phenotypic diversity than disease-associated populations. Second, we identified a clonal population structure associated with asymptomatic Salmonella found in the Canadian swine industry and we confirmed that food-producing pigs are a significant reservoir of Salmonella enterica, more particularly the clinically important serotype Typhimurium DT104. Finally, we identified the possible independent evolution of multidrug-resistance in serotypes Typhimurium, Derby and Heidelberg. Our work on asymptomatic Salmonella enterica stresses the importance of linking ecology and evolutionary biology to public health in order to understand and predict the response of pathogenic bacteria to selective pressure imposed by host immunity, whether naturally or artificially induced.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".