MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7162068820 · doi:10.82308/53960

Effect of folic acid supplementation on adverse morphological and epigenetic outcomes in offspring conceived using assisted reproduction

2018· dissertation· en· W7162068820 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sophia Rahimi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOffspringEpigeneticsFolic acidEmbryoPregnancyDNA methylationReproductionBlastocyst

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Canada, the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) has risen within the last decade due to the increased prevalence of infertility. Although the majority of ART-conceived children are born healthy, the use of these techniques has been associated with an increased risk of adverse offspring outcomes, such as growth and genomic imprinting disorders. In fact, assisted reproduction has been shown to compromise DNA methylation programming during germ cell and early embryo development. The availability of methyl donors, such as folate from the diet, is critical in the proper establishment and maintenance of DNA methylation patterns throughout development. The goal of this study was to determine whether folic acid supplementation can prevent morphological and epigenetic defects in the offspring associated with ART. Outbred female mice were placed on a folic acid control diet (CD; 2 mg folic acid/kg), a 4-fold folic acid-supplemented diet (4FASD; 8 mg folic acid/kg) or a 10-fold folic acid-supplemented diet (10FASD; 20 mg folic acid/kg) for six weeks prior to assisted reproduction and diets were continued until the collection of midgestation embryos and placentas. Mouse ART consisted of treatments used in human ART: a combination of ovarian stimulation (superovulation), in vitro fertilization, embryo culture to blastocyst and embryo transfer. Comparison between pregnancy outcomes from the CD group and naturally mated mice fed the folic acid control diet (NAT-CD) demonstrated that mouse ART resulted in significantly higher levels of pre- and post-implantation loss, reduced embryo viability, and an increased proportion of delayed embryos. Although both doses of folic acid supplementation did not significantly affect implantation rates, resorption rates or overall embryo viability, the 4FASD was associated with a decrease in embryonic delay. Notably, exposure to the 10FASD resulted in a trend towards an increased incidence of embryonic morphological abnormalities relative to the 4FASD group. In fact, craniofacial malformations were more prevalent in the 10FASD group compared to the CD group. DNA methylation was assessed in embryos and placentas by bisulfite pyrosequencing at four imprinting control regions (ICRs): Snrpn, Kcnq1ot1, Peg1 and H19 ICRs. ART was associated with imprinting defects in placental tissues and to a lesser extent in the embryonic tissues. In the placenta, although both folic acid-supplemented diets did not affect mean methylation at imprinted loci, the 4FASD resulted in significantly reduced variance at the Kcnq1ot1 and H19 ICRs, whereas the 10FASD led to increased variance at the Snrpn ICR. In the embryo, decreased variance was observed in the 4FASD group at the Snrpn, Kcnq1ot1 and H19 ICRs; however, the 10FASD was associated with increased variance at the H19 ICR and lower mean methylation at the Snrpn and H19 ICRs. The 10FASD also resulted in decreased variance at the Kcnq1ot1 ICR, but not to the same extent as the 4FASD. In the CD group, a higher proportion of females exhibited abnormal methylation at the Snrpn, Kcnq1ot1 and H19 ICRs compared to males. Interestingly, after moderate and/or high dose folic acid supplementation, the proportion of females exhibiting abnormal methylation at these ICRs was similar to males. Taken together, the morphological and epigenetic results suggest that a moderate dose of folic acid may be beneficial while high doses may be deleterious in ART pregnancies in a mouse model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin PregnancyFrench-language works237,207