Talking through the glosa: an examination of the conversational networks implicit to the glosa form
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En recherchant les possibilités qu'offre l'étude de la conversation entre poètes dans le «glosa», cet ouvrage répond à l'absence de traitement scolaire de la forme poétique en ouvrant de nouvelles avenues théoriques. Afin de comprendre le rôle de la conversation dans un poème, ce mémoire met en parallèle le glosa avec «la collection collaborative», le monologue dramatique, le «pas de deux», l'élégie et la collection de dévouement dans la littérature canadienne contemporaine. Grâce à une analyse comparative avec ces autres formes, ce mémoire développe une nouvelle perspective quant à la manière dont la subjectivité lyrique peut être influencée par la poésie poly-vocale. L'étude aboutit à un recueil de poèmes intitulé «Songs of the Involuntary Night Choir» qui approfondit l'examen des relations entre les poètes et leur contexte social, leurs lecteurs, leurs contemporains et leurs prédécesseurs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".