MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7162071187 · doi:10.82308/29566

Optimization of sampling designs for validating digital soil maps

2016· dissertation· en· W7162071187 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yakun Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Geostatistics and Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital soil mappingSampling (signal processing)Latin hypercube samplingKrigingSampling designSoil mapStratified samplingSimple random samplePrecision agricultureSample (material)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Meeting food demand for ever increasing global population can be attained through sustainable management of soil resources. This requires a thorough understanding of soil properties and processes and calls for methods to quantify and display spatial variability of soil. Three dimensional digital soil mapping (3D-DSM) with its ability to quantify both the horizontal and the vertical variability has become popular in recent days. The state-of-the-art data mining techniques including 3D regression kriging (RK) has been used to uncover complex soil-landscape relationships but not assessed at small scales. In addition, recent advances in proximal soil sensing allow measurement and prediction of various soil properties simultaneously and rapidly at multiple depths and provide required information for DSM. Furthermore, sampling design (SD) plays a vital role in providing a reliable input for DSM, whereas its effectiveness on 3D-DSM has not been tested. A total of 148 sample locations, identified by six SDs, including grid sampling (GS), grid random sampling (GRS), simple random sampling (SRS), stratified random sampling (StRS), transect sampling (TS), and conditioned Latin hypercube sampling (cLHS), were used to collect vis-NIR spectra data to about 1-m depth in-situ using a commercial soil profiler from a small agricultural farm in Macdonald campus, McGill University. A subset of 32 sample locations were identified to collect soil cores down to 1-m depth and sampled at 10-cm depth intervals. A total of 251 samples were analyzed in laboratory for a range of soil properties. Partial least square regression was used to develop soil-spectral relationship model. Predicted soil and uncertainty maps for soil properties were developed using 3D-DSM with RK from the calibration dataset (103 locations) and assessed using validation dataset (45 locations). Further three regression techniques, including generalized linear model (GLM), regression tree (RT), and random forest (RF) were tested and compared for accuracy and efficiency. Maps developed using sub samples (45 locations) identified by six SDs were further compared with the original map produced by the full dataset (148 locations) and individually validated by the rest 103 locations.The results showed that a good prediction was obtained for soil organic matter (SOM) and water-related soil properties from in-situ vis-NIR spectra, while a fair prediction was obtained for other properties. RF outperformed GLM and RT by quantifying the non-linear soil-landscape relationship, displaying weak spatial structure of regression residuals, and resulting in a more robust prediction model with high accuracy and low uncertainty. The predicted maps clearly presented the soil spatial variability, reflected the interactions among soil properties, and displayed the associated soil forming processes. Among the SDs, StRS with both good spatial and feature space coverage better represented the distribution of original maps and showed a small prediction uncertainty, while cLHS produced higher validation accuracy. SRS resulted in good validation results, while requires further exploration for its robustness. The main contribution of this thesis was to assess and optimize the methods and techniques for 3D-DSM and associated SDs and quantify both the horizontal and vertical variability of multiple soil properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.045
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.045
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoil Geostatistics and MappingFrench-language works237,207