Bibliographic record
Abstract
Distributed by The Video Project, 145 - 9th St., Suite 230, San Francisco, CA 94103; 800-475-2638Produced by Chris MetzlerDirected by Bradley Berman2022, Streaming, 73 mins In 2016 The California End of Life Option Act (EOLOA) made it possible for terminally ill patients in California to receive drugs for physician-assisted death. The right to die with dignity has been explored by numerous physicians and journalists - perhaps most famously and controversially by Dr. Jack Kevorkian, a United States physician who was tried in court repeatedly for assisting in suicides and given the moniker “Dr. Death” in the late twentieth century. Recently, the subject was explored in-depth by journalist Katie Engelhart in her book The Inevitable: Dispatches on the Right to Die, in which she interviews physicians and patients from Europe and Australia as well as North America. Jack Has a Plan documents the life and death “plan” of lead subject Jack Tuller in California by his filmmaker friend Bradley Berman. It is a very personal and close-up look of someone with a brain tumor deciding to end life on his own terms. Despite the heavy nature of the subject matter the filmmaker attempts moments of levity with old black and white archival footage and a jazzy score. The archival footage often feels out of place and undercuts the subject, which may have been the intention of the filmmaker who, according to the film, somewhat reluctantly records Jack’s journey. Director Bradley Berman, who also served as editor along with Quinn Costello and Byron W. Thompson, inserts himself into the film as documentarian. Berman explains through direct address to the audience that he was convinced by the main subject Jack Tuller to begin filming after the recurrence of Jack's brain tumor. Berman shows himself going through boxes of material (videos and such) from Jack’s younger, healthier years. He presents a clip from one of Jack’s music videos and uses footage from his wedding in the film but otherwise fails to incorporate much of this source archival footage. The audience cannot help but wonder what is contained in all of those boxes and what stories could be told, which would be an interesting question to raise in a documentary class. Berman barely touches on the complicated process of the California End of Life Option (EOLOA) outside of a small scene with health officials as they provide Jack with the drugs needed and a few scenes with palliative care specialist Torrie Fields who helped to enact EOLOA in California. The scenes with Fields are not traditional interviews but mediated through Jack. It is, after all, Jack’s plan - and Berman as documentarian seems somewhat hamstrung by Jack as subject. Additionally, Berman chooses not to expand on the ethical dilemmas associated with the decision and does not really dwell on Jack’s health deterioration. Jack’s wife is featured prominently in the film and is an incredible asset to Jack throughout the process - and to the film viewer, in terms of navigating what the film does not explicitly depict. There is something performative and deliberate about Jack’s appearance in Jack Has a Plan which is reminiscent of Jason in Shirley Clarke’s 1967 documentary Portrait of Jason. Quite different from the famous Maysles brothers’ cinema vérité exemplified in Grey Gardens or Salesman, this is a film heavily mediated not only in the edit but also onscreen by the filmmaker and the subject. Despite the clear conclusion of the film, it is a documentary that raises many questions without providing many answers. I would recommend it for a class on documentary filmmaking but due to the limited scope it would not necessarily be sufficient for a class on health policy or bioethics. Awards:DC Independent Film Festival, Jury Award, Best of Fest Award; Oneota Film Festival, Jury Award, Best of Fest; Boulder International Film Festival, Jury Award, Impact Award; Dances with Films (LA), Jury Award, Best Documentary; Alameda International Film Festival, Jury Award, Best Documentary Feature; Mystic Film Festival, Jury Award, Best Documentary Feature; Oceanside International Film Festival, Jury Award, Best Documentary Feature; Atlanta DocuFest, Jury Award, Best Documentary Feature; The Poppy Jasper International Film Festival, Jury Award, Best Documentary Feature; Newburyport Documentary Film Festival, Jury Award, David Kleiler Cinephile Award; San Luis Obispo International Film Festival, Jury Award, Best Feature in Central Coast Filmmaker Showcase; Calgary Underground Film Festival, Audience Award, Best Documentary Feature; Lake County Film Festival, Jury Award and Audience Awards, Best Documentary Feature; DOCUTAH International Film Festival, Audience Award, Best Feature ; South Georgia Film Festival, Jury Award, Best Documentary Feature; Twin Cities Film Festival, Jury Award, Best Documentary Feature Finalist; Ojai Film Festival, Jury Award, Best Documentary, Honorable Mention; New Jersey Film Festival, Jury Award, Honorable Mention
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".