MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7162098324 · doi:10.82308/927

The nature and origin of REE mineralization in the Misery syenitic intrusion, Northern Québec, Canada

2013· dissertation· en· W7162098324 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
L Petrella

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFelsicMaficZirconFractional crystallization (geology)PetrochemistryMineralization (soil science)PelitePlutonIntrusion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a result of the recent increase in demand for the rare earth elements, the newly discovered Misery syenitic intrusion is attracting considerable exploration interest. This REE-Zr-Nb prospect is located 200km east of Schefferville and 70km south of Strange Lake in Québec, Canada. It is a 6km wide, ring-shaped intrusion conspicuous on aeromagnetic maps that was emplaced within the Mistastin Batholith, a large Elsonian age granitoid body, which intrudes Paleoproterozoic rocks of the Churchill Province. The Misery intrusion displays a gradational contact with its host, the Misastin rapakivi granite. Both have an A-type affinity and similar trace element composition. The Misery syenites are therefore interpreted to be a late differentiate product of the Mistastin batholith. The dominant exposed lithology (much of the intrusion is covered by a lake) is a felsic syenite, which is mainly composed of perthitic K-feldspar and 1 to 10 volume% of interstitial ferromagnesian minerals, namely fayalite, hedenbergite, ferropargasite and annite (iron rich biotite); the accessory minerals are quartz, iron oxides (magnetite, Ti-rich magnetite and ilmenite), zircon, fluorite, apatite and britholite. A melanocratic unit, ferrosyenite, which contains up to 50 volume % ferromagnesian minerals, including cumulate fayalite and hedenbergite, occurs as amoeboid-like inclusions in the felsic syenite. The ferrosyenite is interpreted to have formed by fractional crystallization of ferromagnesian minerals leaving behind a residual magma which produced the felsic syenites. With continued fractional crystallization, the felsic syenites became more enriched in alkali and silica, and only became saturated with ferromagnesian at a very late stage explaining the interstital crystallization of the latter in the perthite-dominated felsic syenites. The bulk of the REE mineralization (dominantly LREE) is concentrated in pods and layers as hydroxyapatite. Much of this mineralization accumulated through gravity settling in felsic syenite and ferrosyenite, commonly in association with magnetite. The hydroxyapatite crystals were partly or completely replaced by britholite-(Ce), which further concentrated the REE, and crystallized from post-magmatic hydrothermal fluids, which reacted with the magmatic hydroxyapatite. Locally, the felsic syenites underwent sodic metasomatism and where this occurred, the REE were remobilised again to form fluorocarbonate minerals (bastäsite-(Ce), parisite-(Ce) and synchysite-(Ce)). The Misery intrusion and the Mistastin granitoids surrounding it were cut by numerous narrow dykes composed mainly of quartz, fayalite, zircon and fergusonite-(Y). These dykes are interpreted to be products of a FeO-SiO2-rich melt that separated from the main syenite melt and into which Zr and Nb were preferentially fractionated. These dykes represent a new and interesting target for HREE exploration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.199

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→