Les finalités éducatives du programme Sensibilisation à l'entrepreneuriat: une analyse de contenu
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this master's degree research, we investigate the concept of entrepreneurial education in Quebec, particularly at the high school level. Our objective is to study the program Sensibilisation à l'entrepreneuriat, in place since 2009 in Quebec high schools, with a view to identifying, analyzing and assessing its educational aims. To achieve this objective, we first propose to put the program in its political and economic context (one of economic globalization) in order to document the place held by entrepreneurship in our society. The achievement of Quebec's political aims entails a cultural shift and the development of an entrepreneurial identity. To give the reader a clear perspective and support our understanding of the entrepreneurship program, we then take a closer look at the concepts of entrepreneurial culture, entrepreneurship, entrepreneur and entrepreneurial teaching. Using these concepts, we assess the aims of school-based entrepreneurial education proposed by the different authors. Through content analysis, we try to gain deeper insight into the program Sensibilisation à l'entrepreneuriat and the field to which it belongs, that of professional development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".