MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7162107485 · doi:10.82308/54111

Les finalités éducatives du programme Sensibilisation à l'entrepreneuriat: une analyse de contenu

2011· dissertation· fr· W7162107485 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lili-Anne Beaulac

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEntrepreneurshipContext (archaeology)PoliticsEntrepreneurship educationField (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this master's degree research, we investigate the concept of entrepreneurial education in Quebec, particularly at the high school level. Our objective is to study the program Sensibilisation à l'entrepreneuriat, in place since 2009 in Quebec high schools, with a view to identifying, analyzing and assessing its educational aims. To achieve this objective, we first propose to put the program in its political and economic context (one of economic globalization) in order to document the place held by entrepreneurship in our society. The achievement of Quebec's political aims entails a cultural shift and the development of an entrepreneurial identity. To give the reader a clear perspective and support our understanding of the entrepreneurship program, we then take a closer look at the concepts of entrepreneurial culture, entrepreneurship, entrepreneur and entrepreneurial teaching. Using these concepts, we assess the aims of school-based entrepreneurial education proposed by the different authors. Through content analysis, we try to gain deeper insight into the program Sensibilisation à l'entrepreneuriat and the field to which it belongs, that of professional development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.392
Threshold uncertainty score0.780

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences→French-language works237,207→