Exogenous Others and the Decolonization of “The Great Canadian Outdoorsman”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet essai porte sur An Imagined Elsewhere in So-Called Canada , une performance ainsi qu’une installation photographique mettant en scène des personnes sud-asiatiques vêtues de costumes traditionnels escaladant les terres des Sḵwx̱wú7mesh Úxwumixw (la Nation Squamish), afin de remettre en question le mythe blanc du « grand amateur de plein air canadien ». Combinant la recherche artistique avec la théorie décoloniale et la théorie critique de la race, cet article explore la manière dont les colons racialisés naviguent entre complicité et résistance au sein de la culture coloniale du plein air. En mettant l’accent sur l’incarnation racialisée et la terre en tant que participantes actives, le projet bouscule les mythologies nationales exclusives et dévoile les liens coloniaux entre race, loisirs et nature, tout en réimaginant les activités de plein air comme un lieu de possibilités décoloniales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.039 | 0.045 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".