MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7162124902 · doi:10.82308/1250

"A mistake that wasn’t totally a mistake": a study on the incidence of pregnancy, identity, and constructing belonging in street youth

2018· dissertation· en· W7162124902 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Allison N. Scott

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHomelessness and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPregnancyAbortionApprehensionTeenage pregnancyGrounded theoryFocus groupMistakeQualitative researchIncidence (geometry)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rationale: Pregnancy is common in street youth and has a profound impact on their lives. While service providers report cases where pregnancy was the impetus for youth to leave street life, spontaneous abortion, therapeutic abortion and apprehension of a child by the foster care system are more common outcomes. This thesis addresses the following research questions: 1) What is the incidence of pregnancy and reproductive outcomes in female street youth in Toronto as compared to low-income housed youth? 2) What life experiences and socio-cultural contextual elements influence street-involved young women’s contraception use and pregnancy-related decisions?Methods: A parallel mixed methods research design was utilized. The quantitative sub-study estimated the prevalence and incidence of pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes in female street youth under the age of 25 and compared it to an age- and sex-matched housed cohort. Algorithms were created to identify pregnancies from administrative data and time not at risk for pregnancy was subtracted from the person-time denominators. The duration of prenatal and postnatal care and risk factors for pregnancy were described. The qualitative sub-study used in-depth interviews, focus groups, and extended community engagement to understand the meaning of contraception, conception and pregnancy in street-involved young women with diverse pregnancy outcomes. Semi-structured interview guides were developed in consultation with community members. Themes and concepts were identified and refined using line-by-line coding, constant comparison, and analytic memos. Symbolic interactionism and Erving Goffman’s theory of stigma were found to be useful lenses through which to view the data.Results: 158 homeless youth and 540 housed youth were included in the quantitative sub-study and followed for an average of four years. The incidence of pregnancy in single homeless youth was 23.2 per 100 person-years, 2.3 times higher than the rate in housed youth. The incidence in homeless youth with children in their care was 39.7 per 100 person-years. Single homeless youth were more likely to experience a delivery than a therapeutic abortion. The prevalence of pregnancy at recruitment was 14% in single homeless youth, 34% of homeless youth with children in their care and 6% in housed youth. In the multivariate model, prior pregnancies and having children in their care at the time of recruitment was associated with an increased rate of pregnancy.Ambivalence regarding pregnancy and contraception were key findings in the qualitative sub-study. While many women recounted preferring to wait to have children until they had achieved educational, career and housing goals, they also reported not using birth control effectively at the time they became pregnant. The isolation, stigma, the need for belonging and a positive identity were key elements that appeared to contribute to this ambivalence. The women’s accounts suggested that having a child and being with a partner were very meaningful for them and appeared to be ways of creating family, a sense of belonging and a more positive identity. Once pregnant, women recounted making decisions regarding the fate of their pregnancy based on their desire and ability to take on the role and identity of mother. Their previous experiences, their feelings regarding abortion and adoption, their partner’s preferences and characteristics, and their assessment of the consequences for their unborn child were also described as weighing heavily in their decisions. Finally, the young women’s accounts shed light on how they constructed identity and belonging in their other relationships, such as with partners. Conclusion: A complex network of socio-cultural contextual elements, including isolation, identity, and belonging impacts street youth’s pregnancy and birth control-related decisions. These elements may contribute to the high incidence and prevalence of pregnancy in this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHomelessness and Social Issues→French-language works237,207→