MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7162125014 · doi:10.7202/1125286ar

Postcards from the Shore: Reconsidering the Structure of a View

2025· article· en· W7162125014 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
MJ Thompson

Bibliographic record

VenueRACAR Revue d art canadienne · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican history and culture studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChosePower (physics)Position (finance)Subject (documents)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Selon les conceptions vernaculaires et disciplinaires, la « vue » est définie comme étant le fait de voir quelque chose depuis un lieu ou une position particulière. Cette définition implique une présence corporelle située au sein d’un paysage. Cet essai examine la vue en tant que structure et cadre théorique permettant de repenser les relations entre les vues, les pratiques visuelles et les corps en mouvement. Un ensemble de cartes postales illustrant le travail des sauveteurs de Cape Cod, datées entre 1905 et 1907 et conservées par la Société historique de Truro, éclairent le rôle des points de vue et des corps en mouvement qu’ils encadrent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.023
Scholarly communication0.0120.010
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRACAR Revue d art canadienneSame topicAfrican history and culture studiesFrench-language works237,207