Hiker, Painter, Diasporic Picture Maker: Artistic Integrity and Critical Regionalism in the Margins of Canada’s Parks Discourse
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet essai, je mets en relation les oeuvres de David Kaarsemaker et Zinnia Naqvi avec les concepts de régionalisme, dans l’histoire de l’art canadien, et d’« intégrité écologique », dans les stratégies de gestion des parcs nationaux canadiens. Je développe une interprétation phénoménologique de leurs travaux, en actualisant les termes employés par Heidegger dans ses écrits sur l’environnement, pour mieux expliquer les identités coloniales réflexives de Kaarsemaker et Naqvi. En m’appuyant brièvement sur l’exemple de Greg Curnoe et sa conception tout aussi critique de lui-même en tant que colon, je propose une approche du régionalisme qui laisse place à des réflexions sur le déplacement, l’intrusion et l’aliénation, les privilèges et la complicité des colons dans l’art contemporain canadien.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.029 | 0.049 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".