MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7162165093

La construction des inégalités au Canada (17e – 19e siècles) : reproduction familiale, mobilité sociale et parcours élitaires au sein de la famille Drapeau

2025· dissertation· fr· W7162165093 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Raphaël Bergeron-Gauthier

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEliteAgrarian societyPoliticsInequalityEstateProsopographyColonialismLineage (genetic)
DOInot available

Abstract

This thesis offers an analysis of the relationships between mechanisms of family reproduction, upward and downward social mobility, the formation of elites, and ultimately the construction of inequality in Canada from the seventeenth to the nineteenth century. Based on a longitudinal study of five generations of the Drapeau family, established in the St. Lawrence Valley, and structured around a prosopographical investigation involving a corpus of over 630 individuals, this research sheds light on the differentiated dynamics that shape individual and family trajectories in a predominantly agrarian colonial society, one undergoing major legal, economic, and political transformations, particularly in the aftermath of the 1763 regime change. This study follows on from the work of the joint project on the history of French and Quebec rural societies by focusing on the construction of internal inequalities within the same lineage from an intergenerational and intragenerational perspective. It uses a multi-scale approach by articulating the micro (individuals), meso (family units) and macro (branches, lineages, lineage and society) scales. The demographic, geographic, economic, social, legal and cultural dimensions are at the heart of this longitudinal analysis, and serve as a basis for detecting permanences, gaps and ruptures. At the origin of this inquiry lies a fundamental observation : while Joseph Drapeau (1752-1810), a wealthy merchant, owner of the largest seigneurial estate ever held by a Canadian layperson, politician, and elite figure, represents a remarkable upward trajectory, he cannot be studied in isolation. His path, like that of his daughters, the so-called "Dames Drapeau", or his many collateral relatives, only makes sense through a comparative analysis of individual and family trajectories. Indeed, within this same lineage descending from Antoine Drapeau and Charlotte Joly - two commoner settlers of French origin who established themselves in the St. Lawrence Valley in the 1660s and formed the founding couple of the Drapeau lineage in Canada - the vast majority of descendants perpetuated, generation after generation, a lifestyle rooted in rurality and agricultural labor. While a few individuals reached the upper echelons of the social hierarchy, most reproduced a position within the Canadian peasantry. It is this fundamental divergence that constitutes one of the central concerns of this thesis : to understand how, within a single family lineage, such contrasted trajectories could emerge, and what reproductive dynamics account for these profound differentiations. Rather than tracing the rise of a single individual or family unit, this study focuses on a complete family group over more than two and a half centuries, thus contributing to the social history of preindustrial Quebec and Canada, to our understanding of the evolution of colonial elites, and to the study of stratification within rural communities. Keywords : Quebec, Canada, 17th century, 18th century, 19th century, family, inequality, elites, bourgeoisie, nobility, merchants, seigneurial regime, seigneurs, female seigneurs, female power, social mobility, family reproduction, inheritance, peasantry, Coutume de Paris, feudalism, capitalism, colonial society, education, distinction, alliances, strategies.

Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.

How this classification was reachedexpand

The three-model screen

all 5,600 screened works →

All three models called this out of scope.

stratum: french · design weight: 1554.47 (the sample is stratified; any rate computed without the weight is wrong)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Historical dissertation on family reproduction and inequality in colonial Canada; social history, not the research system.

GPT-5.6 (high)OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

The thesis studies family reproduction, social mobility, and inequality in Canadian history.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Social history of family reproduction and elite trajectories in colonial Quebec; Canadian society, not the research system.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207