MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7162200890 · doi:10.59236/emro.v25i7a8021

Scars on the Ground

2023· article· W7162200890 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elena Landry

Bibliographic record

VenueEducational Media Reviews Online · 2023
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American Literature Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBetrayalIndoctrinationGovernment (linguistics)Theme (computing)ChinaScarsQuarter (Canadian coin)Battle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distributed by epf media, 324 S. Beverly Drive, PMB 437, Beverly Hills, CA 90212; 310-839-1500Produced by Gustavo FernándezDirected by Gustavo Fernández2021, Streaming, 122 mins Gustavo Fernandez’ opens his Scars on the Ground with the 1957 betrayal and killing of guerilla leader Guadelupe Salcedo in Bogota at the hands of the Colombian National Police, and the theme of betrayal plays throughout the documentary. After seventy years of bitter socio-economic strife that claimed over a quarter of a million lives, a country fed up with violence and war struggles with reconciliation and reintegration following the 2016 peace accord reached between the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) and the Colombian government. The painful adjustments of this tenuous transition are shown in the stories of four former FARC soldiers. Although their experiences are varied, they all describe journeys from desperately impoverished rural origins through indoctrination into a Marxist-Leninist revolutionary organization offering a sense of community and an alternative to a futile struggle for survival. While trained for combat by the FARC, they were all provided education and medical services, benefits the Colombian government seldom gave to those of their social status. As Johanna, the 18-year veteran put it, “life with the guerillas was beautiful, except for the war, because war is not pretty.” Johanna’s is perhaps the most positive story of the four, with her Red Cross nursing school diploma and daughter’s birthday party celebration. She wears a FARC EP t-shirt over a pregnant belly while describing having to leave her wounded boyfriend behind after an army ambush, and watching other comrades die and be buried in the jungle, but she vows to pass on the principles of equality of the sexes and respect of life and nature as an antidote to the selfishness of capitalism that she learned growing up in the FARC to her own unborn child. On the other extreme is William, 51 years old with no wife or children, alone but for a sick old dog after the death of the mother who he hadn’t been in contact with throughout his decades with the guerillas. Having joined the FARC at 25 with his only other options picking coca or joining the military, he seems close to despair since the disarmament has left him with no occupation. Alberto recounts playing chess with a kidnap victim and how he learned to not befriend hostages because he never knew what might happen to them. Left behind in the jungle after having been wounded, he finally made his way home after six days, determined to take care of his mother. He tells of former comrades and social advocates murdered since the armistice and worries for his own safety as a former FARC soldier and dissident but bears a tattoo with his daughter’s name that he says gives him hope for the future. Another man goes with his girlfriend to the city to vote and reads through his parole agreement with the government. His sister was killed in an ambush, and he doesn’t know where she’s buried. Visiting a museum of the revolution, he reveals that his rifle of twenty years was one of the weapons melted down to make the steel titles of the floor and feels betrayed by the government that promised social reforms. While Colombia has seen a marked decrease in violence since the armistice of 2016, FARC dissident groups and right wing paramilitary organizations remain. Kidnapping and political disappearances persist even as former revolutionaries strive to reintegrate with society. It is to Gustavo Fernandez’ great credit that while putting very human faces on former members of an organization deemed a terrorist group, he neither glorifies their experience, nor demonizes their opposition. His film is an honest portrayal of people trying to reunite with society after years of war and isolation. Awards:"Truth, Peace and Reconciliation Audiovisual Award," The Peace and Reconciliation Memory Center of Bogotá; Official Selection, Latin American Studies Association Int’l Film Festival; Official Selection, Proyecto seleccionado en la Clínica de Proyectos Alados; Official Selection, Bogotá Int’l Documentary Film Festival; Official Selection, Santander Int’l Festival of Independent Cinema

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEducational Media Reviews OnlineSame topicLatin American Literature StudiesFrench-language works237,207