MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7162306657 · doi:10.3997/2214-4609.202533308

New Insights in Hydrocarbon-Generating Potential Of V-23 Rudov Beds (Hot Shale) in the Dnieper-Donets Basin, Eastern Ukraine

2025· article· W7162306657 on OpenAlexaff
S. Levoniuk, B. Kruhlov, J. Hejnar, S. Orynchak, V. Karpyn, S. Iuras, I. Karpenko

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Formations and Processes Exploration
Canadian institutionsCenovus Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)Government (linguistics)PopulationNatural (archaeology)Identification (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary This research provides valuable organic geochemical insights in hydrocarbon-generating potential of V-23 Rudov beds (hot shale) that can improve ongoing exploration strategies for unconventional hydrocarbon resources in the Dnieper-Donets basin, Eastern Ukraine. Organic geochemical parameters indicate a promising commercial unconventional prospect for hydrocarbon generation in the Visean organic-rich formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Formations and Processes ExplorationFrench-language works237,207