MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7162324211 · doi:10.3997/2214-4609.202510307

Joint Bayesian Seismic-Electromagnetic Inversion for CO2 Monitoring: A Synthetic Case Study from the Johansen Formation

2025· article· W7162324211 on OpenAlexaff
V. Entezar-Saadat, A. Khan Mohammadi, B. Denel, C. Farquharson, A. Malcolm

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInversion (geology)Bayesian probabilityJoint (building)Synthetic dataInverse problem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary We develop a new workflow for monitoring CO2 sequestration in aquifers or depleted reservoirs, using the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method with joint seismic and controlled-source electromagnetic (CSEM) data. By assuming a known reservoir geometry, we reduce the computational cost typically associated with stochastic methods. The coupling parameter in our joint inversion approach is the saturation, and we apply this method to the Johansen formation in the North Sea. We evaluate three scenarios including seismic-only, CSEM-only, and joint inversion, and demonstrate that integrating seismic and CSEM data provides complementary insights, resulting in precise estimates of both saturation and CO2 plume geometry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.105

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207