Agentic AI for Zero-Touch Customer Experience: A Governance-Constrained Framework for Autonomous Service Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Agentic Artificial Intelligence (Agentic AI) is transforming customer service by enabling autonomous AI agents to make contextual decisions, orchestrate workflows, and collaborate intelligently with humans. Organizations across banking, healthcare, retail, telecommunications, and cloud-native enterprises are increasingly adopting Zero-Touch Customer Experience (ZTCX) systems to improve scalability, reduce operational delays, and enhance customer satisfaction. However, autonomous service systems introduce major challenges related to governance, compliance, explainability, cybersecurity, accountability, and ethical AI decision-making. Existing AI-powered customer engagement solutions largely lack structured governance mechanisms to control autonomous agent behavior within enterprise and regulatory boundaries. This study proposes a Governance-Constrained Agentic AI Framework (GCAAF) for trustworthy Zero-Touch Customer Experience systems. The framework integrates multi-agent orchestration, policy-aware decision engines, adaptive governance layers, explainable AI modules, real-time observability pipelines, and autonomous workflow optimization mechanisms. The architecture supports full service autonomy while maintaining accountability, regulatory compliance, transparency, and data governance. The proposed framework consists of four major components: autonomous service intelligence, governance enforcement, adaptive orchestration, and continuous compliance monitoring. It incorporates customer intent prediction, contextual reasoning, behavioral analytics, adaptive personalization, ethical AI policies, audit trails, semantic validation, anomaly detection, and risk-scoring mechanisms. Distributed AI agents operate within governance constraints using hierarchical orchestration and reinforcement learning models to optimize customer interactions dynamically. Experimental evaluation demonstrates significant improvements over traditional AI-based customer service systems, including 38% higher operational efficiency, 41% reduction in service escalations, 32% improvement in customer satisfaction, and 57% fewer compliance violations. The framework also enhances observability accuracy, service continuity, adaptive transparency, and enterprise resilience in multi-cloud environments. The study concludes that sustainable Zero-Touch Customer Experience systems must balance autonomy, governance, explainability, resilience, and human oversight to ensure trustworthy and regulation-compliant autonomous enterprise services.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".