MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7162328471 · doi:10.64166/6kny5339

The Impact of Group Rights on Fear and Trust

2002· article· W7162328471 on OpenAlexaff
Will Kymlicka

Bibliographic record

VenueHagar Studies in Society and Culture · 2002
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Philosophy and Ethics
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolidarityEthnic groupIdentity (music)Group (periodic table)TolerationCollective identityHuman rights

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

According to Offe, much of the contemporary Western discourse on ethnic relations has been “enchanted” by ideas of multiculturalism, identity and group rights (Offe, this volume). He worries that defenders of these ideas have focused too much on identifying moral justifications for this or that particular group right, while ignoring more fundamental issues of “political culture”. In particular, defenders of group rights have not considered the impact of these rights on the norms and practices of trust, toleration and solidarity that are needed to sustain a viable democracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.064
Scholarly communication0.0100.011
Open science0.0010.012
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHagar Studies in Society and CultureSame topicPolitical Philosophy and EthicsFrench-language works237,207