MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7162334789 · doi:10.30598/arika.2025.19.2.103

Pola Segregasi Sosio-Spasial di Kawasan Permukiman Akibat Pembangunan Maluku City Mall (Studi Kasus: Desa Galala dan Negeri Hative Kecil)

2025· article· W7162334789 on OpenAlexaff
Novembry Zefnath Huliselan, Pieter Thomas Berhitu, Aryanto Boreel1

Bibliographic record

VenueARIKA · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Growth and Fiscal Policies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeapfroggingRural housingPublic housing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pembangunan pusat perbelanjaan modern seperti Maluku City Mall (MCM) di Kota Ambon membawa perubahan signifikan terhadap dinamika sosial, ekonomi, dan spasial masyarakat di sekitarnya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi pola segregasi sosio-spasial serta menganalisis faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi terbentuknya segregasi pada kawasan permukiman Desa Galala dan Negeri Hative Kecil. Metode yang digunakan adalah mixed methods dengan kombinasi analisis Index of Dissimilarity (IoD), analisis diskriminan, serta analisis spasial berbasis GIS. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa segregasi pada aspek ekonomi dikategorikan rendah (IoD rata-rata 33,33%), sedangkan segregasi pada aspek sosial tergolong sedang (IoD 46,47%). Analisis diskriminan menegaskan bahwa strata masyarakat merupakan faktor dominan yang membedakan tingkat segregasi antar kelompok. Temuan ini mengindikasikan bahwa pembangunan MCM selain mendorong pertumbuhan ekonomi juga berpotensi memperlebar kesenjangan sosial. Oleh karena itu, pengelolaan ruang kota perlu diarahkan pada kebijakan zonasi dan tata ruang yang inklusif agar manfaat pembangunan dapat dirasakan secara merata, sekaligus mencegah fragmentasi sosial di kawasan perkotaan Ambon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.269
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueARIKASame topicEconomic Growth and Fiscal PoliciesFrench-language works237,207