The Legal Responsibility of the Air Carrier for the Damages Caused by Terrorist Operations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
General Background: Global security faces escalating threats from terrorism, particularly targeting air transport systems which constitute critical infrastructure for international commerce and communication. Specific Background: Terrorist incidents in aviation have proliferated, ranging from aircraft hijacking to in-flight sabotage, creating unprecedented challenges for determining civil liability frameworks under international conventions such as the 1999 Montreal Convention. Knowledge Gap: Despite extensive international legislation, ambiguity persists regarding the precise legal basis and extent of air carrier responsibility for damages resulting from terrorist acts during air transportation operations. Aims: This study examines the civil liability of air carriers for terrorism-related damages, analyzing international conventions and judicial precedents to determine accountability parameters throughout the air transport process. Results: The research establishes that carrier responsibility extends to terrorist incidents when adequate preventive security measures are not implemented, with liability encompassing both pre-incident negligence and post-incident failure to mitigate consequences, irrespective of foreign cause defenses. Novelty: The study adopts an expanded interpretation of "air accidents" that encompasses terrorism as carrier-related incidents rather than external events, thereby broadening the scope of compensable damages beyond traditional aviation accident frameworks. Implications: These findings mandate stricter carrier obligations for passenger protection, ensuring compensation accessibility for terrorism victims while promoting enhanced aviation security measures globally.Keywords : Air Carrier Liability, International Terrorism, Civil Aviation Security, Montreal Convention, Passenger CompensationHighlight : Air carriers bear responsibility when failing to implement necessary terrorist prevention measures. Montreal Convention 1999 combines fault-based and objective liability for passenger protection balance. Terrorist incidents qualify as air accidents warranting carrier compensation regardless of perpetrator prosecution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".