MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7162665614 · doi:10.59236/emro.v24i8a7844

Fanny

2022· article· W7162665614 on OpenAlex
Linda Dempf

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEducational Media Reviews Online · 2022
Typearticle
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMusic History and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeRacismPeriod (music)Character (mathematics)Performance artLiving room

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distributed by Film MovementProduced by Bobbi Jo Hart and Robbie HartDirected by Bobbi Jo Hart2021, Streaming, 96 mins Bobbi Jo Hart’s documentary tells the story of the forgotten all-female band Fanny, arguing that the band was a driving force in the late 1960s and early 70s, paving the way for women in rock. The narrative traces the band’s roots in Sacramento, where it began performing as The Svelts, eventually taking on the name Fanny. In 1969, the band moved to Los Angeles, living in what became known as the Fanny Hill House. They were part of the L.A. rock scene, performing in clubs, touring, and hosting regular jam sessions at the house with the likes of Bonnie Raitt, Bob Dylan, and members of Little Feat. Fanny cut several albums with major labels and toured in the U.S. and abroad through the mid-70s, often opening for other hard rock bands like Humble Pie and Deep Purple. Fifty years after the bands’ founding, Fanny reunites to record a new album, “Fanny Walked the Earth” (2018), and the documentary interviews take place during this period, providing rich present-day reflections. These first-hand accounts from Fanny members are a powerful telling of the challenges experienced by women in rock, not only battling sexism, but racism and homophobia as well, as three of the band members were Filipina, and two were lesbians. The film effectively teases out the tension between the rebellion, outsider status, and artistic freedom that is characteristic of rock, and the control imposed by the record labels, agents, producers, and other star-maker machinery of popular music. One member acknowledged the “silent liberation” that music afforded, yet the band was up against a system that basically didn’t know what to do with them. Promoters encouraged Fanny to play up their image of having boyfriends, to wear skimpier outfits on stage, and managers retained a control on their finances and housing situation, creating tension, and leaving some band members artistically stifled. In addition to the interviews with band members, we hear from a star-studded group of fellow rockers and producers, and several younger women talk about the impact that discovering Fanny has had on their musical lives. Fanny’s 1960s and 70s footage from concerts and recording sessions is compelling, and the soundtrack is terrific. The documentary would fill curricular needs in women’s and gender studies, music, and cultural studies. Awards:Rogers Audience Choice Award, Hot Docs; Best Canadian Feature Film, InsideOut Toronto; Best Documentary, Outshine LGBTQ+ Film Festival; Best Music Documentary, Edmonton NW Film Festival; Audience Choice Award, San Diego Filipino Film Festival

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.750
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5900.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it