MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7162721908

Arc, a New Transit Fare Payment System in the Edmonton Metropolitan Region

2022· article· ja· W7162721908 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
功 山下, Isao YAMASHITA

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldEngineering
TopicTransportation and Mobility Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetropolitan areaPaymentTransit (satellite)Transit systemRapid transitPublic transport
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

カナダ国アルバータ州の州都エドモントン市は世界で初めてLRT を導入した公共交通先進地として有名である。本稿では、2021 年秋にエドモントン都市圏の公共交通に新たに導入された運賃収受システムである「Arc」を概観し、カナダの他都市圏および日本との比較を行った。 その結果、カナダの他都市圏では従来の紙乗車券や磁気乗車券の置き換えとしてIC カード乗車券が導入されているのに対して、エドモントンではArc の導入を機に運賃上限制度(fare caps)を採り入れたことが特徴であることが明らかになった。 エドモントンでArc が普及するためには「Arc を利用した方が得である」ような運賃制度の設計が必要不可欠である。その点において、fare caps は一定の効果が見込めるが、利便性が高い乗車券をArc 上でいかに代替するかがETS にとっての課題となる。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.646
Threshold uncertainty score0.705

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)Same topicTransportation and Mobility InnovationsFrench-language works237,207