Effect of plant-based compounds on mucous boundary layer lubrication during tribological contact
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plant-based proteins offer a higher protein-to-CO2 emission ratio compared to animal proteins. However, their sensory attributes are often less palatable, largely due to the presence of polyphenols, which can evoke an astringent sensation. Polyphenols interact with salivary proteins, altering lubrication and mouthfeel. This study explores the effect of two plant-based compounds, fava bean protein isolate and tannic acid (TA), on the lubricating properties and structure of mucous boundary layers using a novel methodology combining quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation, atomic force microscopy, tribometry and fluorescence microscopy.<br/><br/>Results revealed that bovine submaxillary mucins (BSM) adsorb onto PDMS, forming a hydrated layer with excellent lubricating properties. Fava binds to BSM and PDMS surfaces, forming a hydrated layer that sustains lubrication. In contrast, tannic acid on BSM causes mucin aggregation, destabilizing the adsorbed layer and impairing the mucins’ ability to bind onto PDMS. Shear stresses during sliding of a PDMS probe on the destabilized layer results in a visible damage scar indicating boundary layer removal. This study provides insights into the molecular-level mechanisms influencing oral lubrication, emphasizing the importance of tribological assessment in developing polyphenol-rich plant-based foods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".