MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7162735938

What do managers really do? : Explorative results of a student research seminar

2011· other· de· W7162735938 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander Kroll, John Philipp (Prof. Dr.) Siegel

Bibliographic record

Venuepublish.UP (University of Potsdam) · 2011
Typeother
Languagede
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dieses Sonderheft der Schriftenreihe des Lehrstuhls für Public Management präsentiert ausgewählte Ergebnisse eines Lehrforschungsprojektes. Dabei wurde in Anlehnung an Mintzbergs Managementforschung die Frage gestellt, wie Führungskräfte in der Verwaltung tatsächlich ihre Organisationen steuern. Das Sonderheft enthält die explorativen Befunde aus drei empirischen Studien, die von Teilnehmern und Teilnehmerinnen des Seminars durchgeführt wurden.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.351
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0010.009
Open science0.0090.006
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuepublish.UP (University of Potsdam)French-language works237,207