MORTALITY TRENDS IN THE REPUBLIC OF SRPSKA IN THE 21ST CENTURY (2001-2022)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Negative demographic trends in Republic of Srpska (negative natural increase, negative migration balance, aging) have an increasingly significant impact on the socio-economic development Republic of Srpska. At the beginning of the 21st century, the long-term decrease in the number of births and increase in the number of deaths were recognized as destabilizing factors of demographic development. The intensification of population emigration to EU countries and other countries of the world (USA; Canada, Australia) is of particular concern. Mortality in Republika Srpska was influenced by various socio-economic, demographic and epidemiological factors. The main goal of this paper is to analyze the changes in mortality indicators within the framework of contemporary trends in population movements in the Republic of Srpska. The results of the research show that certain changes (positive and negative) related to mortality were recorded in the Republic of Srpska (increase in life expectancy at birth, decrease in infant mortality, and some trends that are not favorable, especially those related to the causes of mortality. Although there was until the decrease in the share of deaths from some diseases, a significant increase in the number of deaths from certain diseases (Covid-19) was recorded, which can attributed to an unhealthy lifestyle and various behavioral factors.Key words: Мortality, mortality by cause, life expectancy at birth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it