In Defense of a Lost Cause: Cooperativism as a Solution to the Malawian Agricultural Predicament
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Malawi represents the developmental problems of Africa. In the past decades, Malawi has gone through a snapshot of the movement of the world’s attitudes towards economic development from protectionism in the 1960’s and 1970’s, neo-liberalism in the 1980’s, post-neo-liberalism in the late 1990’s, and a current antagonistic battle between more or less state-intervention in agricultural policies. Malawi’s history of economic policies and the overall history of most developed nations provide answers to the problems Malawi currently faces. Government intervention in the agricultural sector can help foster economic activity to create the conditions for private markets to develop. Most importantly, public intervention in the form of the creation of a cooperative system of production can work as in the case of the Israeli Kibbutz, the Mennonites in Canada and Mexico, and the fishing cooperatives of Ensenada Mexico, to push for economic, social, and political development. With the help of the international community and international donors, cooperativism in Malawi can become not a written reality but a concrete and material one that breaks the traps of poverty that haunt Malawi so much.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".