MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7162902602

Gebruik nieuwe Rode Lijst bij gegevensverzameling

2001· article· W7162902602 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Author Unknown

Bibliographic record

VenueNaturalis (National University of La Plata) · 2001
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotany and Plant Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)PulpitLow income housing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In juni 2000 is het basisrapport voor de nieuwe Rode Lijst (RL2000) uitgekomen als aflevering 26-4 van Gorteria. Dit rapport is de voorloper van de nieuwe Rode Lijst Vaatplanten die door het ministerie van LNV zal worden uitgebracht en die de FLORON-Rode-Lijst (RL90) zal vervangen. Wat zijn de praktische consequenties van de nieuwe Rode Lijst voor het inventarisatiewerk? Onderstaand de nieuwe richtlijnen. * Voorlopig worden de nieuwe Rode-Lijstsoorten niet als zodanig op de streeplijsten weergegeven. Er komt pas een nieuwe versie van de streeplijst uit op het moment dat er een nieuwe versie van de Heukels’ Flora verschijnt.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.278

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0830.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNaturalis (National University of La Plata)Same topicBotany and Plant Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207