MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7162908305

Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials of Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis of Yang-deficiency Pattern by Acupuncture Plus Moxibustion

2018· article· zh· W7162908305 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
L Jian-jun, YANG Xiao-cheng, JI Ting-ting, XUE Ming-xin

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2018
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldMedicine
TopicTraditional Chinese Medicine Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoxibustionAcupunctureTherapeutic effectOsteoarthritisWOMACTraditional Chinese medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of acupuncture plus moxibustion and simple acupuncture in the treatment of patients with knee osteoarthritis(KOA)of yang-deficiency syndrome.Methods Fifty-eight KOA patients with yang-deficiency syndrome were chosen and randomly divided into acupuncture plus moxibustion group(n=30)and acupuncture group(n=28).Neixiyan(EX-LE 4),Dubi(ST 35),Liangqiu(ST 34),Heding(EX-LE 2),Xuehai(SP 10),Yanglingquan(GB34)on the affected side of the body were punctured with filiform needles or/and stimulated with moxibustion using seed-sized moxa cones.The treatment was conducted once daily for 10 days,followed with another 10 days after 2 days interval.The pain severity was evaluated by using visual analogue scale(VAS),and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index(WOMAC)scores were used to measure the KOA pain,stiffness and function before and after the treatment,and 1 month after the treatment.The therapeutic effect was also evaluated according to the"Standards for Diagnosis and Therapeutic Effect Evaluation of Diseases/Syndromes of Traditional Chinese Medicine"(issued by the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of China in 1994).Results Twenty days and 1 month after the treatment,the scores of VAS,and KOA pain,stiffness and motor function of WOMAC were significantly decreased in both groups in comparison with their own pre-treatment(P<0.01),and were obviously lower in the acupuncture plus moxibustion group than in the acupuncture group(P<0.05,P<0.01).Of the 28 and30 cases in the acupuncture and acupuncture plus moxibustion groups,7 and 12 experienced marked improvement,12 and 16 were effective,9 and 2 ineffective,with the therapeutic effect being 67.86% and 93.33%,respectively.The therapeutic effect of acupuncture plus moxibustion was apparently superior to that of simple acupuncture(P<0.05).Conclusion Acupuncture plus moxibustion is significantly superior to simple acupuncture therapy in relieving symptoms of KOA patients,and also has a better post-effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0190.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.319
GPT teacher head0.585
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicTraditional Chinese Medicine StudiesFrench-language works237,207