Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vespa mandarinia Smith, 1852 (FIG. 35D) Vespa mandarinia SMItH, 1852: 38; tyPe: ♀, NInGbo, ZHejIanG, CHIna; (NHMUK). Material examined. CHINA – HonG KonG • 1♀; SHa Po OLD VILLaGe, LaMMa IsL.; 22°13′33″ N, 114°06′39″ E; aLt. 5 M; C. BaRtHÉLÉMy LeG.; DeaD; 03 May 2008; Ref.: 0288. E.Hy. 1, (CBC). Distribution. BHutan; CHIna: FujIan, GuanGxI, HonG KonG, HubeI, Hunan, JIanGsu, JIanGxI, LIaonInG, SHaanxI, SHanGHaI, SIcHuan, TaIwan, TIbet, Yunnan, ZHejIanG; InDIa: ARunacHaL PRaDesH, AssaM, HIMacHaL PRaDesH, ManIPuR, MeGHaLaya, MIzoRaM, SIKKIM, UttaRaKHanD, West BenGaL; JaPan, IncLuDInG RyuKyu IsL.; KoRea; Laos; MaLaysIa; MyanMaR; NePaL; PaKIstan; RussIa: EasteRn SIbeRIa; SRI LanKa; ThaILanD; VIetnaM. It Is a tRaMP sPecIes In CanaDa: BRItIsH CoLuMbIa; USA: WasHInGton. (CaRPenteR 2023 unPubLIsHeD). Notes. ThIs sPecIes was fiRst RecoRDeD fRoM HonG KonG by BaRtHÉLÉMy et aL. (2014: 11). ThIs sPecIes was once PRobabLy coMMon In HonG KonG, as It was In RuRaL aReas of soutH CHIna not so LonG aGo. The onLy sPecIMen exaMIneD to Date was founD DeaD on a sMaLL IsLanD, a LocatIon fRoM wHIcH It Is unLIKeLy to Have oRIGInateD. It PRobabLy DRIfteD anD LanDeD tHeRe. One obseRvatIon on INatuRaLIst (2019a) sHows a PInneD sPecIMen aLLeGeDLy cauGHt In HonG KonG In 2019. It can be sPecuLateD fRoM tHe RaRIty of obseRvatIons anD tHe contInuous ReDuctIon of HabItats In HonG KonG anD CHIna, tHat tHIs sPecIes Is now extInct In HonG KonG. (RI).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".