MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7163030791 · doi:10.6082/zjbjj-3st96

Mapping the Apachería: American Indian Sovereignty and State Power in the U.S.-Mexico Borderlands, 18th-19th c.

2017· dissertation· en· W7163030791 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Chicago · 2017
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArchaeology and Natural History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNavajoClanSovereigntyDominionState (computer science)ColonialismKinshipPower (physics)TribeIndigenous

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation examines one of the more sustained interactions between Indian nations and European colonists in North America. It traces the history of the diverse populations of Athapaskan-speaking people constituting the Apache and Navajo nations and their relations with the governments of Spain, Mexico, and the United States in the geographical expanse known as the Apachería—a vast region stretching across the present-day states of Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas in the American Southwest as well as Sonora, Chihuahua, and Coahuila in northern Mexico. As distant relatives of the people who migrated from western Canada to the Colorado Plateau and the Central Plains in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, the southern Athapaskans were relative newcomers to the dominion claimed by Spain in 1598 as the Kingdom of New Mexico. Known initially as "Querechos" or "Teyas," the dispersed tribal units of bands and clans developed an extensive trading network, connecting the hunters and gatherers of the Plains with the primarily horticultural societies of the upper Rio Grande valley. When Spanish efforts to colonize the Pueblo Indians of New Mexico faltered in the seventeenth century, the Apaches came to occupy an increasingly prominent position on the periphery of colonial society, absorbing apostate Indians into their structure of kinship relations and themselves becoming integrated into the labor force as prisoners of war, servants, and slaves. While scholars of Native American history have long recognized the central importance of the Apache and Navajo nations in the "cycles of conquest" led by Spanish, Mexican, and American settlers in the region, less attention has been paid to their own territorial ambitions. Historians' emphasis on military engagements have tended to obscure the broad range of cultural, economic, and diplomatic interactions that shaped the Apache and Navajo nations' relations with surrounding Indian and settler societies. Based on extensive research of Spanish colonial records, cartographic materials, and diplomatic correspondence, this dissertation shows how their continuing migration and territorial expansion in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries redefined the boundaries between Indians and colonists in New Spain's northern frontier and exposed the limits of political power in the periphery of both Mexico and the United States.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.668
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it