Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tubularia aurea Fraser, 1936a Tubularia aurea Fraser, 1936a: 504, fig. 1. Syntypes. BCPM 976-00145-001: Canada, British Columbia, Houston Stewart Channel, Danger Rocks, on shore, east end of channel, 17 June 1935, labelled "type"; 60% IPA. BCPM 976-00145-002: Canada, British Columbia, Houston Stewart Channel, Danger Rocks, on shore, east end of channel, 17 June 1935; slide (missing from slide box). Lectotype, by present designation. RBCM 976-00145-003: Canada, British Columbia, Houston Stewart Channel, Danger Rocks, east end of channel, on shore, 17 June 1935, one specimen, 1.3 cm high, in fairly good condition, with gonophores; 70% ethanol. Paralectotypes. BCPM 976-00145-001: Canada, British Columbia, Houston Stewart Channel, Danger Rocks, east end of channel, on shore, 17 June 1935, several specimens, in varied condition, some with gonophores, labelled "type"; 60% IPA. BCPM 976-00145-002: Canada, British Columbia, Houston Stewart Channel, Danger Rocks, on shore, east end of channel, 17 June 1935; slide (missing from slide box). Type locality. Canada, British Columbia: Queen Charlotte Islands (=Haida Gwaii), Houston Stewart Channel, eastern end at Danger Rocks, on shore (Fraser 1936a). Current status. Valid. Remarks. Records of Tubularia aurea in the Fraser Hydroid Collection at the RBCM refer to material in IPA labelled “type” (BCPM 976-00145-001) and on a slide (BCPM 976-00145-002), both from the eastern end of Houston Stewart Channel, Queen Charlotte Islands (=Haida Gwaii), British Columbia, Canada. Although hydroids in the two collections are regarded here as syntypes, the slide is now missing at the RBCM. The lectotype designated here (RBCM 976-00145-003) is the best of the available syntype specimens from the wet (IPA) collection (BCPM 976-00145-001). The remaining specimens in that collection become paralectotypes. The species, known only from a perfunctory original description, is treated as valid in WoRMS. Fraser (1936a) described Tubularia aurea from specimens collected at low tide in Houston Stewart Channel, and from Flamingo Harbour (Flamingo Inlet, Moresby Island, British Columbia). No original specimens from the latter location are known to exist.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".