Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vespa soror du Buysson, 1905 (FIG. 35E) Vespa ducalis vaR. soror Du Buysson, 1905 (1904): 490, 519; LectotyPe: ♀, JIanGxI, CHIna; (MHNP). Material examined. CHINA – HonG KonG • 1♀; PaK SHa O; 22°26′59″ N, 114°19′04″ E; aLt. 70 M; C. BaRtHÉLÉMy LeG.; MaLaIse tRaP; 19–26 APR. 2004; Ref.: M011. C.Hy. 34, (CBC) • 1♀; DItto; HanD net; 04 APR. 2006; Ref.: 0165. C.Hy. 7, (CBC) • 1♀; DItto; 07 Jun. 2006; Ref.: 0190. C.Hy. 5, (CBC) • 1♀; DItto; 28 MaR. 2007; Ref.: 0247. C.Hy. 1, (CBC) • 1♀; PInG SHan CHaI; 22°29′14″ N, 114°11′06″ E; aLt. 140 M; DItto; 21 Jun. 2006; Ref.: 0200. B.Hy. 2, (CBC) • 1♀; TaI Po Kau NatuRe ReseRve; 22°24′53″ N, 114°10′29″ E; aLt. 370 M; DItto; 11–15 May 2006; Ref.: M042. A.Hy. 8, (CBC) Distribution. CHIna: FujIan, GuanGDonG, HaInan, HonG KonG, Hunan, JIanGxI, Yunnan, ZHejIanG; InDIa: ARunacHaL PRaDesH, MeGHaLaya, NaGaLanD, UttaR PRaDesH; Laos; MyanMaR; ThaILanD; VIetnaM. It Is a tRaMP sPecIes In CanaDa: BRItIsH CoLuMbIa (not estabLIsHeD). (CaRPenteR 2023 unPubLIsHeD). Notes. ThIs sPecIes was fiRst RecoRDeD fRoM HonG KonG by BaRtHÉLÉMy et aL. (2014: 11). It Is sePaRateD fRoM tHe suPeRficIaLLy sIMILaR V. ducalis, by tHe LatteR HavInG a naRRow Gena as oPPoseD to an enLaRGeD one In V. soror. CoLonIes aRe subteRRanean anD can coMPRIse seveRaL HunDReD InDIvIDuaLs, wHIcH can DIG out IMPRessIve aMounts of soIL to accoMMoDate foR tHe GRaDuaL IncRease of tHe coLony sIze. ThIs sPecIes Mounts effectIve anD DestRuctIve coMMunaL RaIDs on fooD souRces, anD Many coLonIes of Parapolybia, Polistes anD Apis cerana faLL PRey to tHIs LaRGe wasP. It Is cLoseLy ReLateD to V. mandarinia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".