MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7163102899

Search for Synchrotron Emission from Secondary Electrons of Proton–Proton Interactions in Galactic PeVatron Candidate HESS J1641–463

2024· article· en· W7163102899 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Naomi Tuji, Takaaki Tanaka, Samar Safi-Harb, Felix Aharonian, Sabrina Casanova, R. Kothes, Emmanuel Moulin, Hiroyuki Uchida, Yasunobu Uchiyama

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCanada Research ChairsCalifornia Institute of TechnologyCanadian Space AgencyJet Propulsion Laboratory
KeywordsSecondary electronsSynchrotronSupernovaProton SynchrotronElectronPhotonProtonSupernova remnant
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

HESS J1641−463 is an unidentified gamma-ray source with a hard TeV gamma-ray spectrum, and thus it has been proposed to be a possible candidate for a cosmic-ray (CR) accelerator up to PeV energies (a PeVatron candidate). The source spatially coincides with the radio supernova remnant G338.5+0.1 but has not yet been fully explored in the X-ray band. We analyzed newly taken NuSTAR data, pointing at HESS J1641−463, with 82 ks effective exposure time. There is no apparent X-ray counterpart of HESS J1641−463, while nearby stellar cluster, Mercer 81, and stray-light X-rays are detected. Combined with the archival Chandra data, partially covering the source, we derived an upper limit of ∼6 × 10−13 erg cm−2 s−1 in 2–10 keV (∼3 × 10−13 erg cm−2 s−1 in 10–20 keV). If the gamma-ray emission is originated from the decay of π0 mesons produced in interactions between CR protons and ambient materials, secondary electrons in the proton–proton interactions can potentially emit synchrotron photons in the X-ray band, which can be tested by our X-ray observations. Although the obtained X-ray upper limits cannot place a constraint on the primary proton spectrum, it will be possible with a future hard X-ray mission.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)Same topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207