MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7163195916 · doi:10.66341/interaksi.v1i1.32

Penerapan Microsoft Power BI dalam Pengolahan dan Visualisasi Data Statis dan Interktif

2024· article· W7163195916 on OpenAlex
Dewi Anggraeni, Dewi Maharani, Guntur Maha Putra

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInteraksi Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat · 2024
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlockchain Technology in Education and Learning
Canadian institutionsRoyal Roads University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDashboardBig dataPower (physics)Information technology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Power BI memfasilitasi integrasi berbagai sumber data, termasuk data pendaftaran siswa, kehadiran, hasil evaluasi, dan feedback peserta kursus. Visualisasi interaktif yang disediakan oleh Power BI memudahkan pengelola lembaga untuk mengidentifikasi tren, pola, dan wawasan penting terkait performa kursus, tingkat kepuasan siswa, serta efektivitas pengajaran. Selain itu, kemampuan untuk membuat dan membagikan laporan serta dashboard secara real-time meningkatkan kolaborasi dan transparansi di antara staf dan manajemen. Studi kasus dari beberapa lembaga kursus komputer menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan Power BI dapat memberikan wawasan yang lebih baik untuk strategi pemasaran, peningkatan kurikulum, dan penjadwalan kursus yang lebih efisien. Dengan demikian, Microsoft Power BI menjadi alat yang vital dalam pengelolaan dan visualisasi Big Data di lembaga kursus komputer

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.660
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0120.006
Research integrity0.0010.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it