MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7163295170

First Observation of CP Violation in B0 → D(*)CPh0 Decays by a Combined Time-Dependent Analysis of BABAR and Belle Data

2015· article· en· W7163295170 on OpenAlexfundno aff
A.Abdesselam, Ichiro ADACHI, A.Adametz, T.Adye, H.Ahmed, H.Aihara, S.Akar, M.S. Alam, J.Albert, S.Al Said, R.Andreassen, et. al.

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGreat Southern Development Commission, Government of Western AustraliaScience and Technology Facilities CouncilInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistry of Education, IndiaMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyKorea Institute of Science and Technology InformationAustrian Science FundBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungAlfred P. Sloan FoundationNational Science CouncilEuskal Herriko UnibertsitateaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaU.S. Department of EnergyEuropean CommissionMinisterstwo Edukacji i NaukiDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaMinistry of Science, ICT and Future PlanningNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCP violationKEKBStandard Model (mathematical formulation)Electron–positron annihilationPhysics beyond the Standard Model
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)Same topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207