Bibliographic record
Abstract
How can writers, artists, scholars, performers, best reflect a nation's values, desires, and ambitions in circumstances of censorship, oppression, prohibition, or, most radically, during the upheaval and brutality of war?How to convey the struggle against erasure of history, culture, and identity?And, ultimately, how to convey this to the rest of the world?One possible strategy is to look outward.For nearly two-hundred years, Ukrainian poets, writers, scholars, dramatists, theatre and visual artists have communicated with the global community through the medium of Shakespeare, the most translated and performed playwright in the world.As more than a classic, as a hyper-canonical figure, Shakespeare inhabits a contact zone where many cultures can meet and, thus, where dialogue can take place.For Ukrainians, Shakespeare has, at various times, served as mirror, prism, and megaphone, amplifying and broadcasting their values, hopes and concerns.Such a long and deep engagement with Shakespeare confirms h istorian S erhii P lokhy's c ontention t hat U kraine's "claim to independence has always had a European orientation" (353).Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy addressed the British Parliament.Invoking Shakespeare's Hamlet, Zelenskyy forcefully asserted Ukraine's affirmative re sponse to th e Da nish
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".