Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prionomitus mitratus (Dalman) (Figs 1403-1411; Hab. E 206, G 207) Encyrtus mitratus Dalman, 1820:352. Holotype E, Sweden, NHRM, not examined. Encyrtus chlorinus Dalman, 1820:364. Syntypes G, Sweden, NHRM, not examined. Synonymy with Encyrtus mitratus Dalman by Thomson (1876:162). Encyrtus coniferae Walker, 1837:461. Lectotype E (designated by Graham, 1969:245), Ireland. NMID, not examined. Synonymy with Prionomitus mitratus (Dalman) by Graham (1969:245). Microterys mitratus (Dalman); Thomson, 1876:162. Prionomitus mitratus (Dalman); Mercet, 1921:257. DIAGNOSIS. Female (length about 1.1-1.9mm): head with a transverse purple band across top of antennal scrobes; fore legs, including coxae, completely yellow; head as in Fig. 1405; antenna as in Fig. 1403; ocelli forming an angle of 90°or more, posterior ocelli equidistant from occipital and eye margins or distinctly closer to eye margins depending on the relative width of frontovertex which varies from about one-third to two-fifths head width; fore wing venation as in Figs 1406, 1407; hypopygium (Fig. 1408) more or less completely enclosing ovipositor which is about as long as mid tibia, gonostylus (Fig. 1404) about two-fifths as long as ovipositor. Male (length about 1.0- 1.6mm): similar to female but for antenna (Fig. 1411) and genitalia (Fig. 1411); aedeagus slightly more than half as long as mid tibia. DISTRIBUTION. Holarctic, Costa Rica (Trjapitzin, 1989; Noyes & Hanson, 1996; Noyes, 2019). HOSTS. Not known for Costa Rica, but elsewhere reared from a variety of psyllid (Hemiptera; Psyllidae) nymphs including Palaearctic records from Cacopsylla cratraegi (Schrank), C. melanoneura (Förster), C. peregrina (Förster), C. pyri (Linnaeus), C. pyricola (Förster), C. pyrisuga (Förster), Livilla retamae (Puton) and L. variegata (Löw), and Nearctic records from Cacopsylla americana (Crawford), Ceanothia essigi (Jensen), C. insolita (Tuthill), Euglyptoneura fuscipennis (Crawford), E. minuta (Crawford), E. robusta (Crawford) and Pexopsylla cercocarpi Jensen (see Trjapitzin, 1989; Noyes & Hanson, 1996; Noyes, 2019), BIOCONTROL. Prionomitus mitratus has been introduced into Canada (British Columbia) and USA (California) in an attempt to control Cacopsylla pyricola (Förster), a pest of pears. It has been partially successful in controlling this pest in Canada (McMullen, 1971). In Europe, P. mitratus is regarded as being important in the natural regulation of the same pest in southern France and other countries (Delvare, et al. 1981; Delvare, 1984). MATERIAL EXAMINED Non type material. COSTA RICA, 1E, San José, Cerro de la Muerte, Arroyo Muerte, 3200m, 7-13. iv.1985 (L. Masner); 1E, Hwy 2, km 93, [Cerro de la Muerte]. 83°45’W 9°36’N. 3200m, 1-7.iv.1985 (H. Goulet, L. Masner). Plus a further 32E, 24G, from CANADA, UNITED KINGDOM, FRANCE, SPAIN, ITALY and MONTENEGRO as listed in Noyes & Hanson (1996). Material deposited in NHMUK, INBio, CNC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.028 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".