The integration of planetary health into entry-level curricula of Canadian physiotherapy programmes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This rapid review aims to explore how issues related to planetary health are currently being integrated into Canadian entry-level physiotherapy education programmes. Given the nascence of the field of planetary health, inclusion criteria will include publications available in English, entry-level physiotherapy programmes, and published in 2014 or later (the year that the term “planetary health” was coined, Horton, 2014) that describe the inclusion of planetary health and/or environmental sustainability in curricula. The results of the rapid review will be used to develop a questionnaire to be sent to all entry-level physiotherapy programmes across Canada asking educators to describe any curriculum content they currently deliver on the topic of planetary health and or the impact of climate change on health outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.019 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.015 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".