Achievement of Cognitive Development Aspects of Children Aged 5-6 During the Covid-19 Pandemic at Santa Sesilia Kindergarten, East Flores Regency
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to describe the Achievements of Cognitive Development Aspects of Children Aged 5-6 Years before the Covid-19 Pandemic, and the Achievements of Children's Cognitive Development during the Covid-19 Pandemic, at Santa Sesilia Kindergarten, Lewokluok Village, Demon Pagong District, east Flores Regency. The method used in this study is a qualitative approach. Interview data collection techniques and documentation studies. The data analysis techniques used are data reduction, data presentation and drawing conclusions. The results showed that the achievement of aspects of children's cognitive development before the covid-19 pandemic, most of their children were in the category of developing very well and developing as expected, and the achievement of aspects of children's cognitive development during the covid-19 pandemic showed that most children were in the category of undeveloped and began to develop. The conclusion of this study is that the achievement of aspects of cognitive development of children who were in the school year during the covid-19 pandemic decreased because most of their children were in the category of undeveloped and began to develop, compared to children who were in the school year before the covid-19 pandemic, most of whose children were in the category of developing as expected and developing very well.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it